- #Android browser with flash player built in reddit install#
- #Android browser with flash player built in reddit Pc#
- #Android browser with flash player built in reddit series#
#Android browser with flash player built in reddit Pc#
It should be noted that the merger between the older PC party, and the reform/alliance party was with the Alliance party at massive strength, in the House of Commons with a respectable number of seats, and 100% in charge of the future of the merged party. Which then, after the merger, with what was left of the PCs, formed the minority: Which then morphed into the Alliance Party: It started with the Reform Party, where the PC party lost all but two seats, but the new "Reform" party obtained significant seats: Of which, the "Canadian Alliance" appeared entirely from grass roots. formed from a merger between Progressive Conservative Party Neither provincially, nor federally.įor example, the Conservative Party of Canada: Yet Canada doesn't really have two dominant parties. But you can see the internal radicalization spill out on some issues already, and there's more to come. Slower, because its electorate is a broader coalition with more conflicting goals, and so the direction in which the voters move the party is less clearly defined. And there's some evidence of similar processes happening in the Democratic party. Trump is also part of the same phenomenon - he might not be a sincere believer, but he appears as one to his followers. Tea Party was a wake-up call in that sense, when a bunch of traditional Republican candidates lost to grassroots crazies who said mostly the same things, but who also sincerely believed in those things. So the party platform moves further away from the center, and its agitprop shifts accordingly, creating even more radicalized supporters, who again feed it back into the party etc. And this caused a nasty feedback loop, where agitprop that's thrown by the establishment at the voters, solely for the purpose of convincing them to vote one way or the other (appealing to emotions, especially fear and anger, since it's the most effective way), is regurgitated and injected into internal party matters and policies. So, voters now have a lot more influence over party politics. The American system, where you merely need to register party affiliation in advance, is much more lax - and by now, even that formality is no longer necessary in many states.
In most other countries (where primaries are internal party matters), you have to actually be a member of the party in good standing in order to participate in that party's primary. But they weren't anywhere near as common until the second half of the 20th century, and even then most were non-binding (and their results were often ignored when the "wrong" candidate won them).Īnd the primaries themselves changed over time, generally so as to broaden eligibility. It's not that they didn't exist before - the first ones date back to before the Civil War. To be clear: the politicians would still run on extreme positions, if they saw it as advantageous - but that didn't mean they'd govern accordingly if they won. Since establishment tends to be conservative by its very nature, this provided a screen against more extreme positions. The voters decided which one would be running the show at any given moment, but internal party politics were not readily accessible to the outsiders, and thus candidates and platforms were also vetted by the party establishment. See, historically, when we spoke about parties, we really spoke about their respective establishments. Ironically, I believe it's the increase in democratic processes in American politics that's responsible for this. Whereas a (reasonably-managed, honest) comment section provides loads of information that's actually valuable to the consumer. Maybe your conversion goes up a tick the first time you put them on the site, but when a repeat viewer sees the same ones again they're going to roll their eyes and register you as untrustworthy. _Everyone_ knows the testimonials are garbage. Consider the difference on an ecommerce site between a comment section vs a few company-picked "testimonials" above the fold. If you make it valuable they will use it. Users are able to identify when something is valuable to them. I don't understand why companies constantly do stuff that serves only _themselves_, and then expect users to engage with it because it exists.
#Android browser with flash player built in reddit install#
I'm never going to install it, and I have all but stopped reading it because these prompts are so obnoxious.
#Android browser with flash player built in reddit series#
It is pretty offensive that they say "reddit works better on the app" when the only reason for that is that they broke everything on mobile (on purpose?) in a series of badly-implemented redesigns.
0 kommentar(er)
